-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 imacat wrote:
>> No, I think we need to avoid smbmnt getting these defines. >> This is a setuid app, and I'm worried by how socket wrapper >> (and the environment variable based changes in behaviour) >> would interact, in a security sense. > > Oh. Thank you for reminding me this. This is *really* > a serious security issue. I've recompiled all my samba > without socket_wrapper. Thanks again for pointing out this. No its not a security issue. The socket wrapper stuff is for development testing only. There is no production value in it. cheers, jerry ===================================================================== I live in a Reply-to-All world ----------------------- Samba ------- http://www.samba.org Centeris ----------- http://www.centeris.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFD34L0IR7qMdg1EfYRAr2SAKCNmJ2jMEYFo3qJRxYTabcGrgXabQCgq2SD 0n1Yr8KFZXwjVbFJJVq1KIA= =2e+H -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
