-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hibbard Smith a écrit : > Here it is. As I said, I'm new at Samba. > > This is really borrowed from the sample provided with FC4. I've > edited out everything that I had commented out and the commentary > in the interest of size. > > Thank you all for all the help.
Here, your smb.conf with some corrections : [global] netbios name = Shadow1 workgroup = LANGROUP log level = 5 # for debug, it's better, for prod : 1 server string = Samba Server printcap name = /etc/printcap load printers = yes log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log max log size = 50 security = user password level = 8 username level = 8 encrypt passwords = yes smb passwd file = /etc/samba/smbpasswd socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 dns proxy = no #============= Share Definitions ===================== # idmap uid = 16777216-33554431 # idmap gid = 16777216-33554431 # template shell = /bin/false # winbind use default domain = no # username map = /etc/samba/smbusers # security = user # double # encrypt passwords = yes # double ; guest ok = no ; guest account = nobody [homes] comment = Home Directories browseable = no writeable = yes printable = no [tmp] comment = Temporary file space path = /tmp read only = no ; public = yes [public] path = /TheArray writeable = yes browseable = yes ; guest ok = yes ; public = yes valid users = judith smitty # Theses users exists in passwd and smbpasswd ? # printable = no Could you send the content of the mount command and show me the line with display the mount of /TheArray (the xfs FS). And also the content of log file after a test. > Hopefully, this isn't too screwed up! > > Thanks again, > > Smitty Hibbard T. Smith, JR [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> -----Original Message----- From: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:samba- >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stéphane >> Purnelle Sent: Sunday, February 05, 2006 11:55 AM To: >> samba@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: [Samba] Questions about file >> system support in Samba >> > Hibbard Smith a écrit : >>>> I tried to access these shares from Windows XP Pro SP2 and >>>> got > identical >>>> results. Ext3 filesystems smaller than 2 GB work fine. > Anything bigger >>>> than 2 GB and xfs filesystems of any size fails. >>>> >>>> I guess I'm going to have to resort to reading code, posting >>>> on > bugzilla as >>>> a bug and maybe switching to a Windows based server. I >>>> really > need to get >>>> this system up and doing its intended job. >>>> >>>> I'd really like to hear from someone that they are actually > exporting ext3 >>>> filesystems larger than 2 GB and xfs filesystems and it's > working. If >>>> they're doing so with the Fedora core 4 release, that would > definitely point >>>> to something strange here. >>>> >>>> Smitty Hibbard T. Smith, JR [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> >>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- From: >>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:samba- >>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of >>>>> Craig > White >>>>> Sent: Saturday, February 04, 2006 12:29 PM To: >>>>> samba@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: [Samba] Questions about >>>>> file system support in Samba >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, 2006-02-04 at 12:00 -0500, Hibbard Smith wrote: >>>>>> I'm a relative newcomer to Samba, but very experienced >>>>>> with > computers >>>>> and >>>>>> linux. I'm attempting to build a file/backup server for >>>>>> a > small shop. >>>>> I'm >>>>>> using Fedora core 4 and samba on a system with a 2.1 TB >>>>>> RAID > 50 array >>>>>> formatted as 1 very large xfs partition. I want to share >>>>>> > directories >>>>>> (folders) within the partition with a few Windows XP-Pro >>>>>> SP2 > systems >>>>> which >>>>>> are our primary work-stations. Currently I'm running > samba-3.0.21b. I >>>>>> started with the 3.0.14 that was released with FC4, but > upgraded to the >>>>>> "latest and greatest" when I couldn't make the original >>>>>> work > correctly. >>>>> The >>>>>> kernel has also been upgraded to the Fedora released > 2.6.14.1-1656- FC4- >>>>> SMP. >>>>>> >>>>>> Our business is primarily imaging and video. A large > percentage of our >>>>>> files are over 2 GB with some way over that. Therefore, >>>>>> the > only way >>>>> this >>>>>> could be useful is with very large shared file systems. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Here are the issues and my questions: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> When I try to share this large partition (2.1 TB xfs) and >>>>>> use > smbclient >>>>> to >>>>>> access it, the log records an error which states that >>>>>> "the share > doesn't >>>>>> exist or can't be accessed The error was access denied". >>>>>> I've > made the >>>>> share >>>>>> mode 0777 just to make sure permissions wouldn't get in >>>>>> the > way. If I >>>>> move >>>>>> the share to an ext3 file system that's smaller than 2 GB >>>>>> it works correctly. Any file system over 2 GB or any >>>>>> size xfs file system >>>>> produces >>>>>> the error. I haven't even tried to access the shares >>>>>> from a > Windows >>>>> system >>>>>> yet, I'm just using smbclient on the Fedora system. I'm > pretty sure >>>>> I've >>>>>> got the config and permissions right because just >>>>>> changing the > share to >>>>> an >>>>>> ext3 file system under 2 GB works fine. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> So, here's my question(s): >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> 1) Does samba work with xfs file systems? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> 2) Does samba work with large file systems (2 GB >>>>>> +)? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> 3) If the answer to the above is yes, what might I >>>>>> be doing > wrong? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I haven't been able to find limits documented anywhere. > However, I see >>>>> a >>>>>> great deal of discussion on the web about files over 2 GB >>>>>> > along with >>>>>> suggestions that they work fine. This would imply that >>>>>> file > systems of >>>>> over >>>>>> 2 GB must work okay. I've also seen much discussion >>>>>> which would > suggest >>>>>> that xfs works fine also. All this discussion seems to > indicate that >>>>> I've >>>>>> got something wrong. I'm just not sure what it is or how >>>>>> to > proceed. I >>>>>> have turned samba debugging up and the logs show that the >>>>>> correct >>>>> user/group >>>>>> is being used and that case is working okay. So, I'm >>>>>> really > confused and >>>>> I >>>>>> sure would appreciate any help. I really need to get >>>>>> this > done and I >>>>> don't >>>>>> like the alternative (Windows Server 2003). >>>>>> >>>>> ---- I don't use smbclient much at all but am of the belief >>>>> that > smbclient >>>>> application would use an smbfs type mount and my >>>>> understanding > is that >>>>> an smbfs mount would error on files > 2Gb whereas the cifs > mount would >>>>> not. >>>>> >>>>> samba should have no problems with filesystem of that size. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Craig >>>>> >>>>> -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL >>>>> and read the instructions: >>>>> https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba > What exactly is the error in samba log ? Can you verify the mount > point description and the right of directory that you want to > share. Could you send your smb.conf ? > > > -- Stéphane Purnelle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Site Web : > http://www.linuxplusvalue.be >>> > -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read > the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba > > -- Stéphane Purnelle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Site Web : > http://www.linuxplusvalue.be -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFD5j288tswkE3d0ecRAoE3AJ96nf22q98mq8aOLpFDK43ysLzoMwCeM+AT f9BsSGLfciC0Sj/07qChLJI= =tOST -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba