in our enterprise domain, there´s no reason to have more than ldap backends
greez
Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Folks,
We are discussing removing the capability to chaining passdb
backends. It's a decent idea but overly complicates things
IMO and unless it has wide spread use, we'll probably axe it
soon (voting is starting up on the samba-tecnnical ml now).
To give you an example of what I mean, is anyone using
something like:
passdb backend = smbpasswd ldapsam
If you haven't been using this type of configuration, don't
start now in case is does get removed in the next release.
cheers, jerry
=====================================================================
I live in a Reply-to-All world. -----------------------
Samba ------- http://www.samba.org
Centeris ----------- http://www.centeris.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFD68kFIR7qMdg1EfYRAqSIAKDnBGt/baHgFMW22QbC7iHggn0O6QCeN3y8
EOpRWh9DNy6cxdHGjOUvtuo=
=UVNa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
Michael Gasch
Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology
Department of Human Evolution (IT Staff)
Deutscher Platz 6
D-04103 Leipzig
Germany
Phone: 49 (0)341 - 3550 137
49 (0)341 - 3550 374
Fax: 49 (0)341 - 3550 399
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
