-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Andrew Bartlett wrote:
>> The only thing about the original patch that made me go >> ughh was the new parameter. Can we piggy back this off >> an existing setting somehow? Perhaps 'lanman auth = no'? > > That would be reasonable, and has pro's and cons: > > - The admin probably expects that 'lanman auth = no' > prevents any work (storage and authentication) with > the LM hash > > - But this prevents the admin from storing the hash > for the future, in case he has to back out of the > security upgrade (finds win9X machines back on > the network). Since it would only affect users who had changed their password, I think that's ok. Unless anyone has violent objections I'll make the smake change to Mark's patch and get it in for 3.0.22. cheers, jerry -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEDYQEIR7qMdg1EfYRAszqAJ97E6TmVbzxRXiftmp6xisYt8KApwCdHUPn KFsv+iCIvdHVnRdBxhN5xxA= =01Fo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
