Hey, I agree that a backup of your existing files is 'required' or at least 'wanted'... :) I simply backup /etc/samba and /var/lib/samba... That should solve most problems...
> warning: samba-3.0.21c-1.i386.rpm: V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID > 157bc95e > error: Failed dependencies: > libcrypto.so.5 is needed by samba-3.0.21c-1 > libgssapi_krb5.so.2(gssapi_krb5_2_MIT) is needed by samba-3.0.21c-1 > libk5crypto.so.3(k5crypto_3_MIT) is needed by samba-3.0.21c-1 > libkrb5.so.3(krb5_3_MIT) is needed by samba-3.0.21c-1 > libkrb5support.so.0 is needed by samba-3.0.21c-1 > liblber-2.2.so.7 is needed by samba-3.0.21c-1 > libldap-2.2.so.7 is needed by samba-3.0.21c-1 > libssl.so.5 is needed by samba-3.0.21c-1 > samba-common = 3.0.21c-1 is needed by samba-3.0.21c-1 > samba = 0:3.0.10 is needed by (installed) samba-swat-3.0.10-1.fc2 Hmm, I agree that ONLY samba should be pretty allright... There's probably a huge difference with SuSE and Fedora... Looks like the samba package alone is requiring your LDAP stuff... Kee,, if you are NOT using LDAP, installing them with --nodeps shouldn't be such a major problem. If you ARE using LDAP, you might want to upgrade that first... Hope this helps, Cheers, -- Rory Vieira rory dot vieira at gmail dot com -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
