I am unfamiliar with cachegrind but I assume this is just a profiler. Do you have to compile instrumentation into smbd?
Have fun in Boston, great city. Greg On Fri, 2006-03-31 at 09:17 -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote: > On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 09:49:02AM -0500, Greg Dickie wrote: > > > > Yes, it is the win32 version, but its an old one (1998), not sure how > > the config file will carry to a more recent version. > > > > > > IOmeter Access specifications: > > Transfer req. size = 64Kb & 8Kb > > Percent of Access Specification = 100% > > Type of Operation: 100% read; 100% write; 50% read > > Percent Random/Sequential Distribution: 100% sequential > > Queue Depth = 8 > > Reply Size: No Reply > > Burst Length = 25 I/Os > > Align I/Os on: 64Kb & 8Kb > > Ramp up Time = 30sec > > Run Time = 3 min > > # of clients used: 1 to 9 clients (Linear Stepping) > > > > > > Note that the problem is visible with only one client. > > > > The clients are GbE as is the server, not sure if you will see a > > difference on 100BT. > > > > Thank you very much for looking at this, please let me know if there is > > anything I can do to help. > > No problem. What I'll do is run the version against a smbd > running with cachegrind. That will point out any extra CPU > usage we're accumulating between the two versions. If we've > regressed because of a code path this will tell us. > > Might take a while though as I have to be at LinuxWorld > Boston next week. > > Jeremy. -- Greg Dickie just a guy Maximum Throughput -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
