On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 12:50:37AM +1000, James Peach wrote: > On 5/11/06, Jeremy Allison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 12:29:53PM -0400, Claus Lund wrote: > >> > >> Well, then Windows Explorer is braindamaged as well (which is a claim I > >> won't contest ;) )... because it's slow deleting files right through > >> Explorer as well. > > > >Yep - I completely agree Explorer is braindamaged. That's probably > >the worst of the lot :-). > > > >> Well, it looks like a Samba problem to me (or maybe a compiler/compiler > >> optimization problem?). I'm trying to get Samba compiled using IBM's XLC > >> instead of GCC in the hopes that XLC might produce faster running > >binaries > >> ... but unfortunately that seems like a somewhat involved task (Samba > >> doesn't compile cleanly out of the box with XLC). > > > >If it only happens on AIX, it's not a Samba code logic problem, that's > >what I mean. I doubt modifying compiler flags will do anything about > >actions taking seconds to resolve - that's almost certainly a system > >problem (ie. JFS on AIX). > > sounds like samba is recreating the directory hash for change notifies
It only does that every 30 seconds or so - so I don't think that is the problem (although turning if off might prove me wrong). Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
