On 5/12/06, Jeremy Allison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 12:50:37AM +1000, James Peach wrote:
> On 5/11/06, Jeremy Allison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 12:29:53PM -0400, Claus Lund wrote:
> >>
> >> Well, then Windows Explorer is braindamaged as well (which is a claim I
> >> won't contest ;) )... because it's slow deleting files right through
> >> Explorer as well.
> >
> >Yep - I completely agree Explorer is braindamaged. That's probably
> >the worst of the lot :-).
> >
> >> Well, it looks like a Samba problem to me (or maybe a compiler/compiler
> >> optimization problem?). I'm trying to get Samba compiled using IBM's XLC
> >> instead of GCC in the hopes that XLC might produce faster running
> >binaries
> >> ... but unfortunately that seems like a somewhat involved task (Samba
> >> doesn't compile cleanly out of the box with XLC).
> >
> >If it only happens on AIX, it's not a Samba code logic problem, that's
> >what I mean. I doubt modifying compiler flags will do anything about
> >actions taking seconds to resolve - that's almost certainly a system
> >problem (ie. JFS on AIX).
>
> sounds like samba is recreating the directory hash for change notifies
It only does that every 30 seconds or so - so I don't think that is
the problem (although turning if off might prove me wrong).
IIRC, after each delete, the change notify fires and the client then
reapplies it causing the hash to be recreated.
--
James Peach | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
