Adam Nielsen wrote:
I'm currently testing from a Window 2003 terminal server and, If I use
run->\\file-cabinet I can see all the listed shares and all _except_
the home directory are accessible.

[homes]
        comment = Home Directory
        path = /export/private/%S
        hide dot files = yes
        valid users = %S
        read only = No
        browseable = No


Is it possible that /export/private/%S doesn't exist?  (i.e. %S isn't
what you're expecting it to be?)

If you set the path to /tmp or something, does that make the share
appear?

All the shares appear, I just cannot access the home directory. I tried changing the share path to /tmp with the same results. After playing around a bit I was able to get some useful messages:

[2006/05/14 22:41:16, 4] smbd/reply.c:reply_tcon_and_X(618)
  Client requested device type [?????] for share [SCARVILLE]
[2006/05/14 22:41:16, 5] smbd/service.c:make_connection(776)
making a connection to 'homes' service [SCARVILLE] created at session setup time
[2006/05/14 22:41:16, 3] lib/access.c:check_access(313)
  check_access: no hostnames in host allow/deny list.
[2006/05/14 22:41:16, 2] lib/access.c:check_access(324)
  Allowed connection from  (192.168.124.134)
[2006/05/14 22:41:16, 10] lib/username.c:user_in_list(583)
  user_in_list: checking user TOTALFLOOD\scarville in list
[2006/05/14 22:41:16, 10] lib/username.c:user_in_list(587)
  user_in_list: checking user |TOTALFLOOD\scarville| against |scarville|
[2006/05/14 22:41:16, 2] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(318)
user 'TOTALFLOOD\scarville' (from session setup) not permitted to access this share (scarville)
[2006/05/14 22:41:16, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(147)
error packet at smbd/reply.c(626) cmd=117 (SMBtconX) NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED
[2006/05/14 22:41:16, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(454)
[2006/05/14 22:41:16, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(464)
  size=35
  smb_com=0x75
  smb_rcls=34
  smb_reh=0


I changed the section to:

[homes]
        comment = Home Directory
        path = /export/private/%U
        hide dot files = yes
        valid users = TOTALFLOOD\%S
        read only = No
        browseable = No

And I can now access the directory ... but it's read-only

Oh well, it's progress of a sort...

I'm just wondering whether %S is of the form "username" or
"DOMAIN\username", and whether case sensitivity is important.  I'm
guessing it is, being in a UNIX path name.

Cheers,
Adam.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Reply via email to