-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Alex de Vaal wrote:
> Is there any technical reason NOT to use the packages > of samba.org on RHEL4? Nope. No reason at all other than RH support. > Regarding the above info I'd like to use the > original samba packages on RHEL4. If I only void > support for Samba at Red Hat, so be it. I'm convinced I'm > better off with Samba support at samba.org... For those with more complex setups that a single PDC or standalone server, I would agree. But I'm not signing a contract to support you servers :-) cheers, jerry ===================================================================== Samba ------- http://www.samba.org Centeris ----------- http://www.centeris.com "What man is a man who does not make the world better?" --Balian -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFDeT6IR7qMdg1EfYRAojqAJ94Poy0Zk3m/e8TDJCsmw/x68ih+ACgotnG UV89he1PyOunoIv8tkSNAZM= =hQyt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
