On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 03:55:00PM +0200, Sebastian Held wrote: > Hi, > > Am Donnerstag, 5. Oktober 2006 14:56 schrieb Peter Daum: > > maybe some people would be adventurous enough to just try it out: > > My results (only 1 measurement taken) > WinXP64 -> Samba-3.0.23b/SuSE-Linux-9.2: 2:08 min => 8192 kiB/s (smbd > @18% CPU) > other direction: 2:21 min => 7437 kiB/s (smbd @10% CPU) > > Samba -> Win2k: 4:52 min => 3591 kiB/s (smbd @5% CPU) > Win2k -> Samba: 2:22 min => 7384 kiB/s (smbd @15% CPU) > > The windows machines are not the same. > > compare to nfs performance: > Samba machine -> other nfs machine: 1:58 min => 8886 kiB/s > other direction: 1:55 min => 9118 kiB/s
Unless the "other nfs machine" is also windows this is an apples to oranges comparison. If you want an apples to apples comparison compare using cifsfs on the linux client as your cifs client, not windows. Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
