On Fri, 2006-11-10 at 12:34 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote: > Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote: > > Charles, This is a known issue at the moment. If we did > > a limited amount of nested group expansion (one level for > > example, would that be ok)? > > For our deployment usecase, we'd need an absolute minimum of 3 levels of > expansion, depending on the definition of level. For us we have:
Could the level of recursion be a configuration parameter and just default to 0? That would seem ideal as it would keep backwards compatibility and offer the greatest level of control. Michael Schurter -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
