On Tue, 2006-12-26 at 16:28 -0600, James A. Dinkel wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Andrew Bartlett > > Sent: Saturday, December 23, 2006 3:42 PM > > > > The biggest thing users will notice is that the error message system > > returns contextual errors, with the actual reason for the failure, not > > just the translated code. It often includes the vital clues that help > > fix up the inevitable kerberos issues. > > > > I've use Heimdal in Samba4, particularly because of the close working > > relationship I have with it's primary maintainer. > > > > Andrew Bartlett > > Is this "close working relationship" true of the entire Samba team (or > at least of anyone involved in coding anything related to Kerberos)?
It's a Samba4 thing, because we bundle kerberos in the distribution. > Samba's "Authentication Developer"'s preference of Heimdal over MIT is > good enough for me, but I would like to put some accurate information in > the wiki, as it pertains to Samba users. I went ahead and added a blurb > to this page: http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_%26_Kerberos since > this is the only feedback I've gotten thus far. Almost all users will use the system kerberos libraries, whatever they are. They tend to be difficult to replace. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/ Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc. http://redhat.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
