Chris Garrigues escribió: >> From: Jeremy Allison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 09:56:25 -0800 >> >> On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 11:47:59AM -0600, James A. Dinkel wrote: >> >>> I don't know why, but I just tried this, removind the SNDBUF AND RCVBUF, >>> and the file share does seem snappier. I had never messed with these >>> options, I just found several places that said setting these to 8192 >>> gave a performance increase, so I had always used them. Not any more. >>> >> The trouble with the Internet is that really old advice never dies :-). >> > > I just looked in my own config files and found: > > socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 > IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_KEEPALIVE > > I removed SO_RCVBUF and SO_SNDBUF. > > Of course, I have no idea why any of these were defined in the first place. > > Should any of the others be removed as well? > > Chris > > HP DL380 G5, MSA20 RAID5 750GB samba 3.0.23d en suse 10.1
SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 it worked slow change a SO_RCVBUF=65535 SO_SNDBUF=65535 the yield increase 20% it did not give time me to prove other parameters -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
