On Tuesday 27 February 2007 00:58, Rashkae wrote: > Daniel O'Connor wrote: > > I don't believe the person is modifying the file behind Samba's back. > > They're using Windows to edit the file so it should work fine. > > Then you'll have to explain this in more detail: > > however we find that if the file is modified on the Unix side the > > Win98 box doesn't notice. > > How exactly is it the file is being modified on the unix side?
I have just found that my understanding of the problem was in error. They were modifying the file on the unix side "behind Samba's back" so of course the caching was a problem. I'm not sure why it didn't show up in XP systems though. I have since enabled fam and the problem appears solved. Sorry for the noise, and thanks for the help! -- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C
pgpLkj9O5tlze.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
