At 09:14 PM 4/5/2007 +0100, you wrote:
When i try to swap files between disks on my server using samba i get
errors: then windows reports "The specified network name is no longer
available". Sometimes the copies are fine other times files just wont
copy. Hardware checks out fine. Ive even replaced the network cable
between server and switch thinking that might be causing the problem. Ive
included a ethereal cap of the network during one of these problems, and
my samba config as attachments the errors are as follows:
Apr 5 20:41:53 Ghost smbd[27010]: [2007/04/05 20:41:53, 0]
lib/util_sock.c:get_peer_addr(1229)
Apr 5 20:41:53 Ghost smbd[27010]: getpeername failed. Error was
Transport endpoint is not connected
Please Help im at a loss to what the problem is!
[global]
getwd cache = yes
socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_SNDBUF=65536 SO_RCVBUF=65536
IPTOS_LOWDELAY
use sendfile = no
lock spin time = 15
lock spin count = 30
map to guest = bad user
log level = 1
security = user
os level = 64
local master = Yes
time server = Yes
domain master = yes
preferred master = yes
wins support = yes
domain logons = yes
dos filetimes = Yes
workgroup = Family
netbios name = fileserver
server string = Samba Server %v
printcap name = cups
load printers = yes
printing = cups
printer admin = root @adm @is
log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m
max log size = 50
;hosts allow = 192.168.1.0/24 127.0.0.1
interfaces = eth1 lo
bind interfaces only = yes
encrypt passwords = yes
smb passwd file = /etc/samba/smbpasswd
add user script = /usr/sbin/useradd -d /dev/null -g machines -c
'Machine Account' -s /bin/false -M %u
wins proxy = yes
dns proxy = no
logon path =
logon drive = U:
logon script = %U.bat
oplocks = no
level2 oplocks = no
change notify timeout = 300
lpq cache time = 30
winbind uid = 10000-20000
winbind gid = 10000-20000
winbind separator = +
oplocks = no
level2 oplocks = no
; deadtime = 60
wins proxy = yes
lpq cache time = 30
change notify timeout = 300
getwd cache = yes
dos filetimes = yes
domain logons = yes
obey pam restrictions = yes
unix password sync = Yes
pam password change = yes
passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u
passwd chat = *New*UNIX*password* %n\n *Re*ype*new*UNIX*password*
%n\n \
*passwd:*all*authentication*tokens*updated*successfully*
add user script = /usr/sbin/useradd -s /bin/false '%u'
delete user script = /usr/sbin/userdel '%s'
add user to group script = /usr/bin/gpasswd -a '%u' '%g'
delete user from group script = /usr/bin/gpasswd -d '%u' '%g'
set primary group script = /usr/sbin/usermod -g '%g' '%u'
add group script = /usr/sbin/groupadd %g && getent group '%g'|awk
-F: '{print $3}'
delete group script = /usr/sbin/groupdel '%g'
add machine script = /usr/sbin/useradd -d /dev/null -g machines
-c 'Machine Account' -s /bin/false -M %u
[homes]
comment = Home Directories
browseable = no
writable = yes
oplocks = yes
level2 oplocks = yes
; use sendfile = yes
; preexec = echo "%u, %G, %a, %m (%I)\" >>/tmp/.log
[netlogon]
comment = Network Logon Service
path = /var/lib/samba/netlogon
writable = no
read only = yes
guest ok = no
browseable = no
share modes = no
root preexec = /usr/bin/ntlogon -u %U -g %G -o %a -d
/var/lib/samba/netlogon/
root postexec = rm -f /var/lib/samba/netlogon/%U.bat
[www]
use sendfile = yes
comment = Web Site
path = /var/www
writeable = yes
valid users = @adm
force group = apache
force user = root
create mask = 3754
directory mask = 3754
force create mode = 3754
force directory mode = 3754
oplocks = Yes
level2 oplocks = yes
[logs]
comment = Server Log Files
path = /var/log
read only = yes
force group = root
force user = root
public = no
valid users = @adm
[etc]
comment = Server ETC Files
path = /etc
read only = yes
force group = root
force user = root
public = no
valid users = @adm
[Video's]
comment = Video's
path = /disks/sda
public = yes
only guest = yes
writable = yes
printable = no
oplocks = Yes
level2 oplocks = yes
use sendfile = yes
[Games]
comment = Games
path = /disks/hde
public = yes
only guest = yes
writable = yes
printable = no
oplocks = Yes
level2 oplocks = yes
use sendfile = yes
[Backups]
browseable = yes
writeable = yes
delete readonly = yes
invalid users = cathy,nick,linda
path = /disks/hdi
write list = administrator
force directory mode = 755
force create mode = 755
comment = Backups
valid users = administrator
oplocks = Yes
level2 oplocks = yes
use sendfile = yes
[Admin Files]
browseable = yes
writeable = yes
delete readonly = yes
invalid users = cathy,nick,linda
path = /disks/hdk
write list = administrator
force directory mode = 755
force create mode = 755
comment = Admin Files
valid users = administrator
oplocks = Yes
level2 oplocks = yes
use sendfile = yes
[Downloads]
browseable = yes
writeable = yes
delete readonly = yes
invalid users = cathy,nick,linda
path = /disks/sdb
write list = administrator
force directory mode = 755
force create mode = 755
comment = Downloads
valid users = administrator
oplocks = Yes
level2 oplocks = yes
; use sendfile = yes
[Warez]
comment = Programs & Drivers
path = /disks/hdg
public = yes
only guest = yes
writable = yes
printable = no
oplocks = Yes
level2 oplocks = yes
use sendfile = yes
[Music]
comment = Music
path = /disks/hdc
public = yes
only guest = yes
writable = yes
printable = no
oplocks = Yes
level2 oplocks = yes
use sendfile = yes
[Games & Music & Videos]
comment = Games & Music & Videos
path = /disks/sdc
public = yes
only guest = yes
writable = yes
printable = no
oplocks = Yes
level2 oplocks = yes
use sendfile = yes
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
I have this problem all the time. Samba for me will cause the "The
specified network name no longer exists" (that's how it's worded for me,
not "available") and copy a zero-length file to the destination drive.
Reads from a Samba share are never any problem for me.
If you immediately retry the operation, and immediately say "Y" to
overwrite it, it will succeed.
If you do the above for the first in a series of files to be copied to a
Samba share, it will copy all the rest of them sucessfully.
The other thing that gives this error away is the "getpeername
failed... ...transport endpoint not connected. "
I thought I had this fixed, but after months, it has recurred. The fix I
tried was this (in smb.conf):
smb ports = 139
The explanation I got was that Windows try to connect to a server over
ports 443 and 139 nearly simultaneously, then use whichever one responds
first. Samba replies to both, and it might be that Windows has already
decided which it's going to use, and interprets the double reply as a failure.
Use sendfile = no has also been suggested to me.
Frankly, this is embarrassing, and has kept me from pushing Samba harder.
When I ask about it, nobody seems to have a real answer.
-Tom
-----
595. [Science] Experience has shown that science frequently develops most
fruitfully once we learn to examine the things that seem the simplest,
instead of those that seem the most mysterious. --Marvin Minsky
--... ...-- -.. . -. ----. --.- --.- -...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (remove "nospam") N9QQB (amateur radio)
"HEY YOU" (loud shouting) WEB: http://www.mixweb.com/tpeters
43° 7' 17.2" N by 88° 6' 28.9" W, Elevation 815', Grid Square EN53wc
WAN/LAN/Telcom Analyst, Tech Writer, MCP, CCNA, Registered Linux User 385531
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
