-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Aravinda Guzzar wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > thank you very much for the information. > > Is there any plans to backport smb 2.0 to the 3.0. releases > of samba in future?
To clarify, Samba'4s SMB2 implementation is incomplete. We will implement SMB2 support in Samba 3 when it is absolutely necessary. > What will be the repercussion of using Vista client which has smb > 2.0protocol support aganist non Smb > 2.0 server? Currently it Negotiates with the earlier version of the > protocol. There are no repercussions that we are aware of. The Vista clients simply negotiates NTLM 0.12 (like when connecting to a Windows 2003 server). cheers, jerry ===================================================================== Samba ------- http://www.samba.org Centeris ----------- http://www.centeris.com "What man is a man who does not make the world better?" --Balian -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGOzdFIR7qMdg1EfYRAmwYAJ45ySQoN2+354N3k2PhsNMEwh/BjgCg1XDZ vKEuHw+WUdGl89Vc3YdaH7Y= =3v4P -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
