-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Christian,
> Steve Langasek later suggested that such "now > bogus" configuration options could maybe trigger either > a warning or a rejection by samba so that users do > not end up with unexpected behaviour. > > What would be the Samba Team stance on this ? testparm has historically not been smart enough to make judgment calls on the validity of string values. I'd be more than happy to accept a patch that implemented this in a maintainable fashion (not just hardcoding checks for sertain parameters). cheers, jerry ===================================================================== Samba ------- http://www.samba.org Centeris ----------- http://www.centeris.com "What man is a man who does not make the world better?" --Balian -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGUzxzIR7qMdg1EfYRAk/JAJ47dt4zxq1iLAr8mRY248s7lpHiFACg1sLJ hu6qxhtPghX2uKY6TY9NCo8= =Oc6f -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
