I recall reading somewhere that ECC memory was considerably slower than
non-ECC, and its benefits was mostly sales hype - ie, its ECC was not
precisely reliable...
Anyone know of an authoritative answer to this question?
> While slower, it has benefits for something like a database server.
> For a home machine, the added expense and slower speed are not worth
> it. Not exactly a definitive answer as there is gray area but for a
> production server, I'd throw in ecc
Well, this contradicts what John just said, which is why I asked for an
AUTHORITATIVE source.
John? Anyone? White paper? Unbiased tests/comparison?
--
Best regards,
Charles
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
