Bjørn Tore Sund schrieb:
Jan wrote:
Hey Bjørn,
Hey Jan,
If you bottom-quote and edit when you respond to me, it becomes that
much easier to reply _in_ your email and address specifics there.
Alright! The next time, i will do so :)
the traffic isn't send by a different subnet ...
eth1 = 192.168.0.100 ( default route via 192.168.0.150 )
eth2 = 192.168.0.200
both interfaces belonging to the same net (255.255.255.0) ...
Then you don't have a Samba issue, you have discovered what happens
when you give a Linux box multiple interfaces on the same subnet. The
IP stack implementation is good for a number of things, but gives
interesting results in just such instances.
http://pontus.ullgren.com/view/Multiple_interfaces_on_the_same_subnet
looks like it describes how to solve it using iproute2, other
solutions may be better.
http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/showthread.php?t=6676 gives a
brief runtroügh of the problem, Google may give you more - I didn't
spend much time finding references.
I stopped giving Linux boxes two interfaces on the same subnet a long
time ago. :)
That hurts so much but you're right and your explanation about the IP
stack implementation was one of the things i didn't thought about.
Sometimes the team spirit work wonders thanks for that :)
eth2 is not configurated with an default route. could this be the
failure? (i don't think so because the route for the default gateway
was set for eth1 only by /etc/conf.d/net)
You can only have one default route out of a computer. You can,
however, use iproute2 to configure it to always respond to traffic
through the interface it was contacted on, and lots of other
interesting things. Highly recommended to look into.
Yes i used it in the past but really? i don't knew what i was working on.
I started working with linux (especially gentoo) about 3 years ago but
there will be
more things then samba breaking my neck.
output of route table:
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref
Use Iface
192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0
0 eth1
192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0
0 eth2
127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0
0 lo
0.0.0.0 192.168.0.150 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0
0 eth1
i hope that could bring some light on this situation ...
The situation is nicely illuminated, yes. :)
Bjørn
I love gentoo and the majority of the linux faction. thanks for your help
best regards
Jan
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
