On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 17:57 -0400, Josh Kelley wrote: > On 16 Aug 2007 19:17:00 +0200, Helmut Hullen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > And you shoudn't allow 445 - together with 139 (?) it produces other > > error messages, even listed in the Samba documentation. > > Port 445 is SMB over TCP/IP. In theory, at least, it's preferable to > port 139 (SMB over NetBIOS over TCP/IP), since there's no NetBIOS > overhead. While permitting both 445 and 139 causes error messages, > the errors are completely and totally harmless (see > http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_Myths), and IMO it's not worth > disabling the more efficient TCP port 445.
'more efficient in this case is one packet in each direction as the start of the session. Nothing else changes - even the NETBIOS header remains - just renamed :-). Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/ Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
