Ralf Gross schrieb: > > [2007/11/20 13:43:45, 0] smbd/server.c:allowable_number_of_smbd_processes(220) > allowable_number_of_smbd_processes: number of processes (501) is over > allowed limit (500) > [2007/11/20 13:54:00, 0] smbd/server.c:allowable_number_of_smbd_processes(220) > allowable_number_of_smbd_processes: number of processes (501) is over > allowed limit (500) > [2007/11/20 14:04:57, 0] lib/util_sock.c:get_peer_addr(1229) > getpeername failed. Error was Der Socket ist nicht verbunden > [2007/11/20 14:42:56, 0] smbd/server.c:allowable_number_of_smbd_processes(220) > allowable_number_of_smbd_processes: number of processes (501) is over > allowed limit (500) > [2007/11/20 14:51:21, 0] lib/util_sock.c:get_peer_addr(1229) > getpeername failed. Error was Der Socket ist nicht verbunden > > I've the following in my smb.conf: > > max smbd processes = 500 > deadtime = 15 > > [...] > # smbstatus -p -b | wc -l > 60 > > # ps -eLf | grep smbd | wc -l > 58 > > # pgrep -lf smbd | wc -l > 57 > > # netstat -tunp | grep smb | wc -l > 55 > > # ps aux | grep nmbd | wc -l > 1 > > > So my questions are: > > * why is smbd complaining about >500 processes if only 74 are running? > * how can I check what the resason for the message/number of proecesses is?
I searched samba's bug db, but didn't find anything with allowable_number_of_smbd_processes as search term. A search in the lists archive also returned only my own posting as result. Am I misinterpreting the 'max smnd processes' option? Ralf -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
