On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 06:10:47PM -0500, Michael Lueck wrote: > I get the impression that smbfs is samba.org developed code where as cifs > is from elsewhere. Thus the point of confusion. Why is samba.org not > developing the preferred code in this case?
The problem is -- where would you host smbmount if we removed it from the samba release? Volker
pgpDKCfy5j5xL.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
