On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 10:53 -0500, Ernie Buford wrote: > Would samba-technical also be a better place for tricky > diagnostic questions that aren't getting responses here? > > (ref. http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2008-February/138710.html) > > Please pardon my inexperience... I've used Samba for years > but haven't delved into the lists until my recent trouble.
Generally no, just because one person's 'tricky diagnostic question' is another person's failure to read documentation. It quickly descends into farce, not because of your post, but because of what others then do. Naturally, it's a bit more blurred that that, and once you end up at source level debugging, or patches, then samba-technical is the place, but it's a line we try to hold. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/ Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
