On 3/13/2008, Eric Boehm ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
If I have 50 clients with one connection (one share) now, that's 50
connections.
This could increase to 300*50 connections. Granted, not every client
will be active on every share at the same time but I could easily see
that I could go from 1 to 10 connections per client.
I am interested in knowing or at least estimating how Samba might
perform under these conditions.
It might be better if you define the problem and/or goal first...
*Why* dod you need 300+ shares? Maybe there's a better way to do it? For
example, you could define one (or a few) shares, then using a
combination of permissions and the 'hide unreadable' setting, users will
only see the folders that they have access rights to...
--
Best regards,
Charles
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
