Windows Server CAL's are not required when using a Samba server, so costs are going to be lower. Apple shouts that from the highest mountains when they discuss Mac OS X Servers in a mixed environment.
Andrew Philipoff Programmer Analyst Department of Medicine IT Services, UCSF Phone: 415-476-1344 http://medicine.ucsf.edu/domit DOM Helpdesk: 415-476-6827 -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of JJB Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 1:41 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [Samba] Help: justification for Linux PDC vs Windows... Hello, My IT department has implemented a samba PDC and now we are taking flack for it. Can anyone help me out with some good justifications for doing it this way vs the Microsoft way? Have a meeting about it in a short while... We wanted to do it because Linux is more secure and more stable. But there may be other good reasons and it would be good to know them. Or maybe it would be better to go with the Microsoft solutions? Thanks, Joel -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
-- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
