I meant to specify: it has a noticeable improvement ON MY SYSTEM. This is from a personal, subjective view and I don't know that I've verified this from any other documentation. I just want to point this out because it COULD have been all in my head. I don't think overall transfer speed changed, but directory listings and opening up small files seemed to be faster.
James P.S. Sorry for the formatting, but I'm posting this from Outlook which is not very mailing-list-friendly. -----Original Message----------------------------------------------------- From: Charles Marcus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 21, 2008 11:22 AM To: James A. Dinkel Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Samba] Can't kill smbd process On 4/21/2008, James A. Dinkel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > TCP_NODELAY is still usefull and has a noticeable improvement in > responsiveness. this is contrary to what the Samba devs have repeatedly said in the past. I hope someone will chime in here and set the record straight... -- Best regards, Charles -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
