What about the mysql/pgsql backend ??!
ideal for the middle class. (if your intentions are running a pdc/bdc)
Collen.
Edmundo Valle Neto wrote:
Charles Marcus escreveu:
On 5/15/2008 3:40 AM, Esteban Torres Rodriguez wrote:
I'm new here and I have a doubt... I'm work with windows 2003 server
and now i would change to llnux. My doubt regards the share of my
server: to authenticate my users what is better: samba tdb or ldap?
For us is not necessary an active directory, domain, ecc... I need
only a file server and I have arounud 400 users...Anyone have
experience? Any suggestions?
always ldap.
Not necessarily...
tdb is *very* fast and reliable, much simpler to set up and maintain,
and if you don't *need* all the bells and whistles of ldap (high
availability, SSO, etc), tdb is the better choice - at least in my
opinion...
Depends of what is needed, in my opinion if an user must have the same
password in samba AND any other service, use LDAP.
Regards.
Edmundo Valle Neto
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
