Am Dienstag, 28. Oktober 2008 schrieb James Kosin: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Bernd Kloss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "James Kosin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2008 2:15 PM > Subject: Re: [Samba] PDA-Logon: mal formed packet > > > Am Sonntag, 26. Oktober 2008 schrieben Sie: > >> ----- Original Message ----- > >> From: "Bernd Kloss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> To: "James Kosin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> Sent: Saturday, October 25, 2008 4:12 AM > >> Subject: Re: [Samba] PDA-Logon: mal formed packet > >> > >> > Am Samstag, 25. Oktober 2008 schrieben Sie: > >> >> ----- Original Message ----- > >> >> From: "Bernd Kloss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> >> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> >> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> >> Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 9:41 AM > >> >> Subject: Re: [Samba] PDA-Logon: mal formed packet > >> >> > >> >> > Am Freitag, 24. Oktober 2008 schrieb James Kosin: > >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- > >> >> >> From: "Bernd Kloss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> >> >> Newsgroups: linux.samba > >> >> >> Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2008 3:40 PM > >> >> >> Subject: Re: [Samba] PDA-Logon: mal formed packet > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Am Donnerstag, 23. Oktober 2008 schrieb Bernd Kloss: > >> >> >> > > Can you send the full trace, not just this error message? > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > Thanks, > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > Volker > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > I can only attach the file exported by wireshark, but don't know > >> >> >> > whether > >> >> >> > this will pass through to the list. > >> >> >> > What else could I do? > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > Thanks > >> >> >> > Bernd > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Okay, the attachment did not pass through. How can I publish the > >> >> >> information? > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> ---- Reply ---- > >> >> >> Bernd, > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Copy and paste the relavent packets to the email. They don't need > >> >> >> to > >> >> >> be > >> >> >> large attachments. Just need to see the packets... especially the > >> >> >> malformed one. Try to highlight the one that is malformed if > >> >> >> possible. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> James > >> >> > > >> >> > Hello, > >> >> > > >> >> > unfortunately I could not C&P from wiresharks GUI, but I did set > >> >> > the loglevel > >> >> > in smb.conf to 10 and found something maybe relevant: > >> >> > > >> >> > The name of the domain is > >> >> > azimmer > >> >> > and the user is > >> >> > bk > >> >> > and the PDA is > >> >> > wm_bk > >> >> > with it's machineaccount > >> >> > wm_bk$ > >> >> > > >> >> > Whereas in the logfile the last letters are missing: azimme\b > >> >> > The login-mask of the PDA says correctly bk at azimmer. > >> >> > > >> >> > EXCERPT FROM LOGFILE: > >> >> > > >> >> > [2008/10/24 15:00:01, 5] auth/auth_util.c:make_user_info_map(206) > >> >> > make_user_info_map: Mapping user [azimme]\[b] from workstation [] > >> >> > READ LINE ABOVE > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > ..... > >> >> > [2008/10/24 15:00:01, 5] auth/auth_util.c:is_trusted_domain(2055) > >> >> > is_trusted_domain: Checking for domain trust with [azimme] > >> >> > ...... > >> >> > [2008/10/24 15:00:01, 5] auth/auth_util.c:is_trusted_domain(2055) > >> >> > is_trusted_domain: Checking for domain trust with [azimme] > >> >> > [2008/10/24 15:00:01, 5] > >> >> > passdb/secrets.c:secrets_fetch_trusted_domain_password(644) > >> >> > secrets_fetch failed! > >> >> > [2008/10/24 15:00:01, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:pop_sec_ctx(432) > >> >> > pop_sec_ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 > >> >> > [2008/10/24 15:00:01, 10] lib/gencache.c:gencache_get(194) > >> >> > Cache entry with key = TDOM/AZIMME couldn't be found > >> >> > [2008/10/24 15:00:01, 5] > >> >> > libsmb/trustdom_cache.c:trustdom_cache_fetch(183) > >> >> > no entry for trusted domain azimme found. > >> >> > ...... > >> >> > Primary group is 0 and contains 0 supplementary groups > >> >> > [2008/10/24 15:00:01, 10] > >> >> > passdb/pdb_smbpasswd.c:smbpasswd_getsampwnam(1283) > >> >> > getsampwnam (smbpasswd): search by name: b > >> >> > [2008/10/24 15:00:01, 10] > >> >> > passdb/pdb_smbpasswd.c:startsmbfilepwent(229) > >> >> > startsmbfilepwent_internal: opening file /etc/samba/smbpasswd > >> >> > [2008/10/24 15:00:01, 5] > >> >> > passdb/pdb_smbpasswd.c:getsmbfilepwent(527) > >> >> > getsmbfilepwent: returning passwd entry for user bmx$, uid 9010 > >> >> > [2008/10/24 15:00:01, 10] > >> >> > passdb/pdb_smbpasswd.c:getsmbfilepwent(501) > >> >> > getsmbfilepwent: LM password for user bk invalidated > >> >> > [2008/10/24 15:00:01, 5] > >> >> > passdb/pdb_smbpasswd.c:getsmbfilepwent(527) > >> >> > getsmbfilepwent: returning passwd entry for user bk, uid 9011 > >> >> > [2008/10/24 15:00:01, 5] > >> >> > passdb/pdb_smbpasswd.c:getsmbfilepwent(527) > >> >> > getsmbfilepwent: returning passwd entry for user mk, uid 9012 > >> >> > [2008/10/24 15:00:01, 10] > >> >> > passdb/pdb_smbpasswd.c:getsmbfilepwent(501) > >> >> > getsmbfilepwent: LM password for user iserver$ invalidated > >> >> > [2008/10/24 15:00:01, 5] > >> >> > passdb/pdb_smbpasswd.c:getsmbfilepwent(527) > >> >> > getsmbfilepwent: returning passwd entry for user iserver$, uid > >> >> > 9021 [2008/10/24 15:00:01, 5] > >> >> > passdb/pdb_smbpasswd.c:getsmbfilepwent(527) > >> >> > getsmbfilepwent: returning passwd entry for user admin, uid 1000 > >> >> > [2008/10/24 15:00:01, 5] > >> >> > passdb/pdb_smbpasswd.c:getsmbfilepwent(527) > >> >> > getsmbfilepwent: returning passwd entry for user Absinthe87$, uid > >> >> > 9022 [2008/10/24 15:00:01, 5] > >> >> > passdb/pdb_smbpasswd.c:getsmbfilepwent(527) getsmbfilepwent: > >> >> > returning > >> >> > passwd entry for user wm_bk$, uid 9023 [2008/10/24 15:00:01, 5] > >> >> > passdb/pdb_smbpasswd.c:getsmbfilepwent(578) getsmbfilepwent: end of > >> >> > file reached. > >> >> > [2008/10/24 15:00:01, 7] > >> >> > passdb/pdb_smbpasswd.c:endsmbfilepwent(346) > >> >> > endsmbfilepwent_internal: closed password file. > >> >> > > >> >> > [2008/10/24 15:00:01, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:pop_sec_ctx(432) > >> >> > pop_sec_ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 > >> >> > [2008/10/24 15:00:01, 3] auth/auth_sam.c:check_sam_security(282) > >> >> > check_sam_security: Couldn't find user 'b' in passdb. > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > [2008/10/24 15:00:01, 5] auth/auth.c:check_ntlm_password(272) > >> >> > check_ntlm_password: sam authentication for user [b] FAILED with > >> >> > error NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_USER > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > [2008/10/24 15:00:01, 3] > >> >> > auth/auth_winbind.c:check_winbind_security(54) > >> >> > check_winbind_security: Not using winbind, requested domain > >> >> > [AZIMMER] > >> >> > was for this SAM. > >> >> > [2008/10/24 15:00:01, 10] auth/auth.c:check_ntlm_password(260) > >> >> > check_ntlm_password: winbind had nothing to say > >> >> > [2008/10/24 15:00:01, 2] auth/auth.c:check_ntlm_password(318) > >> >> > check_ntlm_password: Authentication for user [b] -> [b] FAILED > >> >> > with > >> >> > error > >> >> > NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_USER > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > Here the smbpasswd: > >> >> > > >> >> > bmx$:9010:AF71F1BDD67558BAAAD3B435B51404EE:8616F970B19F63F2BAA0C8DC > >> >> >375 F38 6F: [W ]:LCT-44DC63E8: > >> >> > bk:9011:XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX:547DC33C79766AE133C9D8DCB5 > >> >> >8B1 288 > >> >> > > >> >> >: [U ]:LCT-4900C4DF: > >> >> > > >> >> > mk:9012:254DDB6CFC8F23A0AAD3B435B51404EE:93A8F8DDBB175806412DA67A8E > >> >> >0EC 2BB > >> >> > > >> >> >: [U ]:LCT-44DC64BA: > >> >> > > >> >> > iserver$:9021:XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX:3CB8039A9897BF47CB74 > >> >> >909 33D EFF502: [W ]:LCT-46694824: > >> >> > admin:1000:EF05D513B7BB207BAAD3B435B51404EE:EFBDE31F66AB16402EB2AFA > >> >> >874 546 65F: [U ]:LCT-466957D9: > >> >> > Absinthe87$:9022:7228482F80DE563A9DD8171677BC2ED7:5AEF1D7A38592C96E > >> >> >3EB 889 705795CDF: [W ]:LCT-466B1C45: > >> >> > wm_bk$:9023:NO PASSWORDXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX:NO > >> >> > PASSWORDXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX: > >> >> > [NW ]:LCT-00000000: > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > BMX$ is a XP-Client an working fine. > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > Thank you for helping so far. I attach the logfiles. > >> >> > > >> >> > Regards > >> >> > Bernd > >> >> > >> >> Bernd, > >> >> > >> >> Can you send a copy of the relavent configuration file. It looks as > >> >> thought either samba is configured for a domain, unless this is > >> >> always checked in samba... Volker would be able to tell for sure. > >> >> The other possibility is someone has configured the PDA for a domain. > >> >> And > >> >> the PDA is missending this information; confusing samba if not > >> >> configured for a domain. > >> >> > >> >> James > >> > > >> > Hello, > >> > > >> > attached I send the smb.conf and the logs after setting domain logons > >> > = no. > >> > > >> > No success. The XP-Client can connect properly. > >> > I searched the PDA (LOOX N560, Windows Mobile 5) for a string > >> > "azimme*" in the > >> > registry, but could not find anything. As far as I recall, there was > >> > nothing > >> > to to on the PDA as making the WLAN run and using the filemanager with > >> > \\zeus\data > >> > and I always could logon without being asked for a password. > >> > > >> > The trunkatet domain azimme[r] an username b[k] still remain in the > >> > log: > >> > > >> > [2008/10/25 09:49:57, 5] auth/auth_util.c:make_user_info_map(206) > >> > make_user_info_map: Mapping user [azimme]\[b] from workstation [] > >> > [2008/10/25 09:49:57, 5] auth/auth_util.c:make_user_info(120) > >> > attempting to make a user_info for b (b) > >> > [2008/10/25 09:49:57, 5] auth/auth_util.c:make_user_info(130) > >> > making strings for b's user_info struct > >> > [2008/10/25 09:49:57, 5] auth/auth_util.c:make_user_info(162) > >> > making blobs for b's user_info struct > >> > [2008/10/25 09:49:57, 10] auth/auth_util.c:make_user_info(180) > >> > made an encrypted user_info for b (b) > >> > [2008/10/25 09:49:57, 3] auth/auth.c:check_ntlm_password(220) > >> > check_ntlm_password: Checking password for unmapped user > >> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the new password interface > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > regards > >> > Bernd > >> > >> Bernd, > >> > >> Can you try two things, > >> (1) try logging in with the PDA using the workgroup and user name like > >> this (azimme\azimme) for the login. This should work as well for the > >> workgroup, I believe. > >> (2) try using a different workgroup. I think what may be happening is > >> samba is getting sidetracked by the user and workgroup being the same > >> name. > >> > >> James > > > > Hello, James > > > > (1) and (2) did not work. So I tried something else, but with a similar > > result. > > > > Please excuse my missing skills configuring SAMBA properly. > > Let me briefly explain my intention: > > On server ZEUS with workgroup AZIMMER there are several users (members in > > the > > group users) for instance bk created with unix- and samba-accounts. They > > should be allowed to access their homes as /home/bk. > > They also should be allowed to have full rights using the > > directory /zeus/data. > > > > I tried several things. State at the moment is: > > > > [homes] > > comment = Home Directories > > browseable = no > > writable = yes > > create mask = 0700 > > directory mask = 0700 > > valid users = %S > > > > [data] > > path = /data > > browseable = yes > > printable = no > > writable = yes > > guest ok = yes > > read only = no > > create mask = 0777 > > directory mask = 0777 > > inherit permissions = yes > > # valid users = %S, bk, mk, admin, Absinthe > > # valid users = %S > > # valid users = bk, mk, admin, Absinthe > > valid users = %U > > > > This is working for XP-clients. The user logged on can connect to his > > home and > > also to data. > > > > Trying to log in from the PDA I log on as bk for domain azimmer. Reading > > the > > log-file I get the impression that samba is looking for a user b instead > > of > > bk on domain azimme instead of azimmer. The last character is always > > missing. > > > > [2008/10/26 18:44:15, 5] auth/auth_util.c:make_user_info_map(206) > > make_user_info_map: Mapping user [azimme]\[b] from workstation [] > > [2008/10/26 18:44:15, 5] auth/auth_util.c:make_user_info(120) > > attempting to make a user_info for b (b) > > [2008/10/26 18:44:15, 5] auth/auth_util.c:make_user_info(130) > > making strings for b's user_info struct > > [2008/10/26 18:44:15, 5] auth/auth_util.c:make_user_info(162) > > making blobs for b's user_info struct > > [2008/10/26 18:44:15, 10] auth/auth_util.c:make_user_info(180) > > made an encrypted user_info for b (b) > > [2008/10/26 18:44:15, 3] auth/auth.c:check_ntlm_password(220) > > check_ntlm_password: Checking password for unmapped user > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the new password interface > > [2008/10/26 18:44:15, 3] auth/auth.c:check_ntlm_password(223) > > check_ntlm_password: mapped user is: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Does this help in any way to spot the mistake? > > > > Regards > > Bernd > > Volker, > > I'm putting the thread back on samba. I think this may be either a Windows > CE issue or some sort of misconfiguration. > Anyone have any ideas??? > > James
Hello, James and Volker, first of all thank you very much for your engagement. Let me just point out one thing: Until september 2008 I had Debian Etch running on my server and the PDA was working fine. While upgrading from Etch to Lenny I did not change the smb.conf nor the configuration of the LOOX N560 PDA (there is nothing to change. I can tell it to make DHCP, configure WPA2. That's it.) From then on the PDA could not log on to the server, but still works fine with the XP-Clients. I am wondering why it is looking for a user and a workgroup both missing the last letter as Lenny-SAMBA is showing it in the log. Regards Bernd -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
