Hello,
I've seen I'm not the only one impacted with this issue these times on
the mailing list :)
I did the following test (Debian packages) :
Server & Client : samba 3.2.5
mount -t smbfs : ~35Mo/s
mount -t cifs : ~35Mo/s
smbclient : ~80Mo/s
Server & Client : samba 3.0.24
mount -t smbfs : ~35Mo/s
mount -t cifs : ~35Mo/s
smbclient : ~60Mo/s
This is the first time I try smbclient.
There is a real big difference between mount and smbclient !
And it seems to be better to use the 3.2.5 version which is ~ 20Mo/s
better than the 3.0.24 version.
Again, all of this was tested without using the disks (buffer cache).
Do you know where does this difference comes from ?
Fabien
Volker Lendecke a écrit :
On Sat, Jan 03, 2009 at 02:26:01AM +0100, Fabien wrote:
I'm gonna try that and post the results here as soon as possible.
Do you think it could really make a difference knowing that I also tried
the WindowsXP native client without being able to notice any difference ?
Not sure, but for me it makes a difference.
Volker
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
