​Hi Alec,

Yes, somehow I also found this right after I sent out the email....
So if I want to filter this kind of alignment out, is there a flag could
use?

I am still wondering the big difference between mapped reads count?​

btw, the 'supplimentary' word in flagstat output, is a typo?

Thanks for response.

Daofeng

On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Alec Wysoker <al...@broadinstitute.org>
wrote:

>  Hi Daofeng,
>
> bwa mem produces supplementary reads.  A supplementary read is an
> additional alignment for the same read.  Note that:
>
> 33187055 (total BWA MEM records) - 18543 (supplementary alignments)  ==
> 33168512 (total BWA ALN records)
>
> -Alec
>
>
> On 10/29/14, 11:47 AM, Daofeng Li wrote:
>
>  Dear BWA lists,
>
>  Recently I tried to use BWA mem algorithm for aligning our reads and I
> found there is some difference between their results.
> So I have 75bp single end reads, I have reads file from 4 lanes and I did
> alignment separately and merged later, below are samtools flagstat output
> for aln and mem, respectively:
>
>  mem:
>  samtools flagstat combine_index1.bam
> 33187055 + 0 in total (QC-passed reads + QC-failed reads)
> 0 + 0 secondary
> 18543 + 0 supplimentary
> 0 + 0 duplicates
> 28739571 + 0 mapped (86.60%:-nan%)
> 0 + 0 paired in sequencing
> 0 + 0 read1
> 0 + 0 read2
> 0 + 0 properly paired (-nan%:-nan%)
> 0 + 0 with itself and mate mapped
> 0 + 0 singletons (-nan%:-nan%)
> 0 + 0 with mate mapped to a different chr
> 0 + 0 with mate mapped to a different chr (mapQ>=5)
>
>
>  aln:
>  $ samtools flagstat combine_index1.bam
> 33168512 + 0 in total (QC-passed reads + QC-failed reads)
> 0 + 0 secondary
> 0 + 0 supplimentary
> 0 + 0 duplicates
> 22191474 + 0 mapped (66.91%:-nan%)
> 0 + 0 paired in sequencing
> 0 + 0 read1
> 0 + 0 read2
> 0 + 0 properly paired (-nan%:-nan%)
> 0 + 0 with itself and mate mapped
> 0 + 0 singletons (-nan%:-nan%)
> 0 + 0 with mate mapped to a different chr
> 0 + 0 with mate mapped to a different chr (mapQ>=5)
>
>  my question is that why the total reads number would differ? And also
> there is large difference between mapped reads count also... is this normal?
>
>  tools versions:
>
>  Program: bwa (alignment via Burrows-Wheeler transformation)
> Version: 0.7.10-r789
>
>  Program: samtools (Tools for alignments in the SAM format)
> Version: 1.1 (using htslib 1.1)
>
>  Thanks.
>
>  Daofeng
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Samtools-help mailing 
> listSamtools-help@lists.sourceforge.nethttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/samtools-help
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Samtools-help mailing list
Samtools-help@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/samtools-help

Reply via email to