Hi Paul,
Oh ok. I did not understand that they are used to denote RM Destination and
RM Source.
+1 for the name change.
Thanks,
-jaliya
----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Fremantle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jaliya Ekanayake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, November 19, 2006 1:40 PM
Subject: Re: [Sandesha2] Ranaming of the Bean and BeanManager classes
Jaliya
Anyone reading the spec will find the terms RMS and RMD very valuable
to help them understand the function of those objects.
Paul
On 11/19/06, Jaliya Ekanayake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just an idea;
Do we need "RM" prefix in the classes? IMHO they are already in sandesha
packages so putting "RM" prefix is not necessary.
How about SequenceBean and MessageBean.
Thanks,
-Jaliya
----- Original Message -----
From: Chamikara Jayalath
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 19, 2006 12:25 PM
Subject: [Sandesha2] Ranaming of the Bean and BeanManager classes
Hi All,
I think its better to rename following StorageManager classes. The new
names
map better to the task done by them.
CreateSequenceBean -> RMSBean
- Contains data of the sequences for which the current Sandesha2 instance
works as a RMS
NextMsgBean -> RMDBean
- Contains data of the sequences for which the current Sandesha2 instance
works as a RMD
Following two Bean Managers should also be renamed.
CreateSequenceBeanMgr -> RMSBeanMgr
NextMsgBeanMgr -> RMDBeanMgr
Comments?
Chamikara
--
Paul Fremantle
VP/Technology, WSO2 and OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair
http://bloglines.com/blog/paulfremantle
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
