Hi Paul, Sorry, think I was too hasty. If u meant the policies that were defined by the WSRM 1.0 spec. Yes I agree.
It will be lot easier to hv those with one namespace and others configuration data with another. Please raise a JIRA. Chamikara On 12/5/06, Chamikara Jayalath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Paul, How can we exactly define real wsrm policy statements ? Chamikara On 12/4/06, Paul Fremantle < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Folks > > I notice we use the wsrm namespace for our own internal config policy > statements as well as the real wsrm policy statements. That seems to > me to be a bug. I notice rampart is very clear about using a separate > namespace. > > Does that mean that neethi will publish our internal configs as well > as the public policies? > > If you agree its a bug I will raise a JIRA. I suggest that we > deprecate the wsrm: versions and encourage people to move over to a > new namespace. > > Paul > > -- > Paul Fremantle > VP/Technology, WSO2 and OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair > > http://bloglines.com/blog/paulfremantle > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
