[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SANDESHA2-130?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

David Illsley resolved SANDESHA2-130.
-------------------------------------

    Resolution: Won't Fix

I'm not sure this is really a bug. If the RM implementation has accepted the 
message then there is a failure, then the expected behaviour is that the send 
is re-tried. There isn't a way for sandesha2 to identify whether an exception 
is transient or permanent, and whether it is an infrastructure bug or transport 
failure, or something else. I think that the current behaviour is perhaps the 
best we can expect, except perhaps for additional tracing in Sandesha2 and 
Rampart...

> Exceptions in Axis stack not reported to client
> -----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SANDESHA2-130
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SANDESHA2-130
>             Project: Sandesha2
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 1.3
>         Environment: Axis2/Rampart/Sandesha2 v 1.3
>            Reporter: Hans G Knudsen
>            Priority: Blocker
>
> Hi!
> If errors occurs in the Axis stack after Sandesha has taken over handling - 
> the exception is not handed back to the calling client.
> Eg. if an error occur in Rampart trying to do the outgoing security handling.
> Testcase:
> - misspell 
>     <ramp:passwordCallbackClass>wrong.class.Name</ramp:passwordCallbackClass>
> Sandesha does not recognize the error situation - and continues according to 
> sending policy. And the session times out with the following error :
>    Sandesha2 could not send the message on sequence <URL> as the sequence has 
> timed out.
> I have only had time to test on version 1.3.
> /hans

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to