Alexander, Tried with airscan:
tsayao@CO85635:~$ scanimage -d 'airscan:e1:RICOH SP 3710SF (31317e)' > test.pnm Output format is not set, using pnm as a default. scanimage: sane_start: Device busy On the first run it took ~10 minutes and I killed the process. Further tries generates "Device busy". For some reason scanimage -L listed: tsayao@CO85635:~$ scanimage -L device `escl:https://172.18.15.247:443' is a Ricoh SP 3710SF (31317e) flatbed scanner device `escl:https://172.18.15.249:443' is a Ricoh SP 377SFNwX (cff831) flatbed scanner device `airscan:e1:RICOH SP 3710SF (31317e)' is a eSCL RICOH SP 3710SF (31317e) ip=172.18.15.247 device `airscan:e0:RICOH SP 377SFNwX (cff831)' is a eSCL RICOH SP 377SFNwX (cff831) ip=172.18.15.249 device `airscan:w2:XEROX Corporation WorkCentre 3345' is a WSD XEROX Corporation WorkCentre 3345 ip=172.18.15.248 And then on subsequent tries, just: tsayao@CO85635:~$ scanimage -L device `airscan:e1:RICOH SP 3710SF (31317e)' is a eSCL RICOH SP 3710SF (31317e) ip=172.18.15.247 device `airscan:e0:RICOH SP 377SFNwX (cff831)' is a eSCL RICOH SP 377SFNwX (cff831) ip=172.18.15.249 Em qui., 21 de jan. de 2021 às 14:54, Alexander Pevzner <[email protected]> escreveu: > Hi Thiago, > > On 1/21/21 8:05 PM, Thiago Milczarek Sayão wrote: > > > |Note: The device does not work using escl. > > Did you try sane-airscan instead of sane-escl? > (https://github.com/alexpevzner/sane-airscan, > https://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/pzz/) > > > |Since we have 530 stores, I would like to configure only 530 machines > > (instead of 3000). So the idea is to install the Ricoh package on this > > "central" machine and share with the others. > > Do you really need each of 3000 machines to have access to each of 530 > scanners? > > I guess, on each of the 530 stores you have one scanner and ~6 machines, > connected through the local network. > > If you use eSCL protocol with the working backend, and client machine > and scanner are on the same LAN, typically no configuration is required; > scanner is automatically discovered by client computers via LAN. > > So in your situation, it would be better to rely on automatic discovery > and configure 0 machines instead of 530 or 3000. > > I'm also concerned about technical possibility for a single computer to > serve 530 scanners to 3000 clients. It can be quite noticeable load for > a single computer. > > -- > > Wishes, Alexander Pevzner ([email protected]) > >
