Good day!
I'm having trouble translating, so I'm using Google translator. Sometimes he
translates not very clearly ... (((
If I understood the recommendation correctly, I needed to insert the line DEV
("Canon i-SENSYS MF110/910 Series", "MF110", MF110_PID, 600, 0, 640, 1050,
PIXMA_CAP_JPEG) at the end of the pixma_imageclass.c file. Did I understand
correctly?
I did not find such a file on my computer ... I duplicate information about my
system:
scanimage -V
scanimage (sane-backends) 1.1.1-debian; backend version 1.1.1
scanimage -L
device `pixma:04A927ED_1C8612000350' is a CANON Canon i-SENSYS MF110/910 Series
multi-function peripheral
Configuration:
Dell Inc. OptiPlex 3080, Intel® Core™ i3-10105T CPU @ 3.00GHz × 8, Mesa Intel®
UHD Graphics 630 (CML GT2)
Ubuntu 22.04.1 LTS (x64) (start with 18.04 and upgrade to 20 and to 22), Gnome
42.4, SimpleSacn 42.0
PS: The picture that was deciphered is exactly the one that I scanned))
PSPS: Question: With what commands can I rebuild the backend in the future?
26 октября 2022, 02:14:53, от "Ralph Little" <skelb...@gmail.com>:
Hi,
On 2022-10-25 11:50, Ralph Little wrote:
Hi,
On 2022-10-23 23:43, Вассисуалий Пупкин wrote:
Hello.
Did the scan report intercepted by wareshark help? How can I additionally help
to resolve the issue with the drivers on the Canon MF112?
Sending another report from Wareshark.
Many thanks!
I have decoded the data stream from the PCAP and converted it into a PNM file
to see what it looks like and I can see what you see. For RAW data, there
aren't enough bytes for the dimensions requested (150dpi at 1280x2100 geometry)
and I get a mostly empty document with a strip of fuzz at the top.
I did wonder if the data was JPEG because some pixma machines output JPEG but
I do not see a JFIF header in the data.
If you wish, you could set the machine definition to expect JPEG in the entry
in pixma_imageclass.c for your machine, at the bottom of the file:
DEV ("Canon i-SENSYS MF110/910 Series", "MF110", MF110_PID, 600, 0, 640,
1050, PIXMA_CAP_JPEG),
...and rebuild the backend. Then see if it works for you. I don't know if the
JFIF header requirement is strictly necessary. This is something that I am
learning about at the moment. If you need help on building the backend then let
us know and we can help.
Some pixma machines (like in the mp150 family) support JPEG only on the ADF. I
don't see such a restriction in the code for imageClass machines however.
Actually, I missed the first entries that the scanner sends and it is indeed
JPEG, but it has an EXIF format. That's actually new to me. You never stop
learning.
The header information is sent much earlier, evidently before the main scanning
process gets going.
0040 ff d8 ff e1 00 fd 45 78 69 66 00 00 4d 4d 00 2a ......Exif..MM.* 0050
00 00 00 08 00 08 01 0f 00 02 00 00 00 06 00 00 ................ 0060 00
6e 01 10 00 02 00 00 00 11 00 00 00 74 01 1a .n...........t.. 0070 00 05 00
00 00 01 00 00 00 85 01 1b 00 05 00 00 ................ 0080 00 01 00 00 00
8d 01 28 00 03 00 00 00 01 00 02 .......(........ 0090 00 00 01 31 00 02 00
00 00 06 00 00 00 95 02 13 ...1............
00a0 00 03 00 00 00 01 00 01 00 00 87 69 00 04 00 00 ...........i....
00b0 00 01 00 00 00 9b 00 00 00 00 43 61 6e 6f 6e 00 ..........Canon.
00c0 4d 46 31 31 30 2f 39 31 30 20 53 65 72 69 65 73 MF110/910 Series
00d0 00 00 00 00 96 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 96 00 00 00 ................
00e0 01 30 31 2e 30 31 00 00 07 90 00 00 07 00 00 00 .01.01..........
So what I would suggest is to perform the above modification to the device
entry and try a scan. It will probably work.
Cheers,
Ralph
