> Simon Matter via sane-devel <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Can it be that the problem is in the usb subsystem of the kernel? >> Because it fails where there is interaction with it and it fails >> always in the same place. >> >> Thanks, >> Simon > > It might be interesting to run something like ofiles while the > system is in this "open failed" state, to see if there's a leftover > process holding the device. >
I don't see any leftover processes. I've also run it in single user mode and it's all the same. Note that I have to start the button daemon 10 or 20 times to see the error. So it's not every time but still often. Simon
