Hi, On Sun, Feb 03, 2002 at 11:26:43AM +1100, Ben Finney wrote: > Hmm. This seems like something that should be checked by the program, > not merely assumed and left to segfault later. Where should I report > this bug?
Here. But see also my other response. > It's also rather counter-intuitive; it's my primary scanner device, so > having a '/dev/scanner' symlink is a logical policy, and not something > that should create assumptions about which bus it is connected to. The problem is that 5 years ago there nothing but SCSI scanners (and some parport or similar stuff). So /dev/scanner looked like the right thing. Probably /dev/scsiscanner would have been better. I'm not sure if it's worth all the trouble to change this. Bye, Henning
