Hi. I will add it to the todo list.
Bye Oliver Major A schrieb: > > Another suggestion for SANE2: > > In sane_control_option(), the info passed back in *i should allow the > backend to ask for the preview to become invalid. I think this would > be useful for backends which can change something fundamental (like > exposure) that changes the way the image is scanned. This is not > essential, it would just make the interface more idiot-proof: a > frontend could mark the preview as invalid (with a red line through it > or similar -- not by deleting the preview!) to indicate that the image > to be scanned will be different from the one in the preview. > > Therefore, how about SANE_INFO_INVALIDATE_PREVIEW ? > > We could also go for a more elaborate approach which allows the > backend to request corrections to the preview. If, for example, red > channel exposure is increased by a factor of 1.2, it would be possible > to correct the preview without scanning a new one. (Note: this could > be the exposure time of the scanner, which is independent of the > LUTs.) Any suggestions? > > Andras > > =========================================================================== > Major Andras > e-mail: [email protected] > www: http://andras.webhop.org/ > =========================================================================== > _______________________________________________ > Sane-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.mostang.com/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel -- Homepage: http://www.rauch-domain.de sane-umax: http://www.rauch-domain.de/sane-umax xsane: http://www.xsane.org E-Mail: mailto:[email protected]
