Hi, On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 07:49:21PM -0700, Jeremy O'Leary wrote: [Epson 1650 not found by SANE] > C:* #Ifs= 1 Cfg#= 1 Atr=40 MxPwr= 0mA > I: If#= 0 Alt= 0 #EPs= 1 Cls=09(hub ) Sub=00 Prot=00 Driver=hub > E: Ad=81(I) Atr=03(Int.) MxPS= 2 Ivl=255ms > T: Bus=01 Lev=01 Prnt=01 Port=00 Cnt=01 Dev#= 2 Spd=12 MxCh= 0 > D: Ver= 1.10 Cls=ff(vend.) Sub=ff Prot=ff MxPS= 8 #Cfgs= 1 > P: Vendor=04b8 ProdID=0110 Rev= 3.02 > S: Manufacturer=EPSON > S: Product=EPSON ScannerA
By the way, the devices entries start with "T:" (topology). So the first three lines are from a different device and some lines are missing. > If I run scanimage --list-devices, it reports "No scanners where > identified", but sane-find-scanner reports "found USB scanner (vendor = > 0x04b8, product =0x0110) at device /dev/usb/scanner0" If sane-find-scanner finds the scanner, it's also found by the kernel. If it was found before you added the options entry to /etc/modules.conf, that entry wasn't necessary. > I did edit /etc/modules.conf and added > > options scanner vendor=04b8 product=0110 I'm not sure, if it works without the "0x" (for hexadecimal numbers). Try options scanner vendor=0x04b8 product=0x0110 > The next time I boot the system, I see an error message saying something > to the effect of drivers could not be found (I don't have the exact > text). If it doesn't work, the exact text may be interesting (maybe it's in /var/log/messages?) > Any ideas? Did you configure the epson backend? See man sane-epson and /etc/sane.d/epson.conf. Probably it's enough to uncomment "usb /dev/usb/scanner0" in that file. Bye, Henning
