Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 12:07:57PM +0100, Lars Täuber wrote: > >>>>i attached the scanner to a linux box running X and had no problems >>>>using xsane with the local epson backend. >>>> >>>> >>>You are using the standard epson backend that comes with sane and not >>>the epson kowa backend made by Epson? >>> >>> >> >>no, i use sane backend (is the kowa backend for sane?) >> > > There is a backend made by Epson that also has the name "epson".
as a backend for sane or as standalone? > > >>1.0.9 on both - client and server >> >>there is another client in the intranet that has not the problems but it >>is an older xsane (0.77 i think) and an older sane version (1.0.7 i >>think), but i'll have a lock again >> >>(xsane 0.77 -> net client 1.0.7 -> saned server 1.0.9 works) (10mbit >>switched) >> >>(xsane 0.90 -> net client 1.0.9 -> saned server 1.0.9 doesn't work) >>(100mbit switched) >> > > That's interesting. There is only one change in the net backend > between 1.0.7 and 1.0.9 that may cause problems with options. Well, at > least theoretically. The new code looks correct for me. > > Can you test xsane 0.90 with net client 1.0.7 or vice versa? So we > could find out if the difference is xsane or the net client. > maybe, because it's not my box but i'll try > Bye, > Henning -- Gruß Lars Täuber
