Hi, On Sunday, 12. January 2003 15:43, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote: [SNIP] > > Hmpf! Depends on how you classify status? On one hand you're > > right - the scanner is not supported perfectly, on the other hand, > > the backend code is stable so far - so what? > > For the backend status I think "alpha" is "works somehow, but may > crash or do unexpected things". "beta": "Works ok but not 100% stable > in all situations". > > For the per-scanner status I usually use something like that: "alpha": > is detected and does scan something, but colors may be completeyl off. > "beta": works, but maybe not in all modes or up to the highest > resolution. "stable": everything works. > > Usually if I put a comment after the scanner that describes something > that doesn't work it's not stable. But that's only my personal opinion. >
think you're right here - we have the backend status and at least the per-scanner status, so we should, ahem I should use this more precisely - I'll change it before 1.0.10 release. Gerhard
