Hi, On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 04:40:30PM +0100, Jaeger, Gerhard wrote: > after checking the unsupported.desc, I'm a little bit confused about the > Visioneer 4400. I got a report, that it has the following VID/PID: > vendor ID 0x0461, product ID 0x0347
> This one is exactly the PrimaScan 2600u. Right. The Ids from the PrimaScan 2600u seem to be right. I got them from a usenet article: http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=de&lr=&ie=UTF-8&frame=right&th=dcb7cbc97e419aaa&seekm=b0pvfg%24oa1%241%40newsg2.svr.pol.co.uk#link1 > Steven Ellis reports this device as LM983x one > http://homepages.paradise.net.nz/stevenel/scanner/ But he also writes "E5" in the chipset column (?). > and unsupported.desc says something about the E1 chipset??? That was just a guess based on the E1.ini and viceo.dll that were provided by the Windows driver. I don't know, if there is an E1 chipset at all. Is this typical for a lm983x scanner: T: Bus=01 Lev=01 Prnt=01 Port=01 Cnt=01 Dev#= 7 Spd=12 MxCh= 0 D: Ver= 1.00 Cls=00(>ifc ) Sub=00 Prot=00 MxPS= 8 #Cfgs= 1 P: Vendor=0461 ProdID=0347 Rev= 0.04 S: Manufacturer=Primax S: Product=USB Scanner C:* #Ifs= 1 Cfg#= 1 Atr=40 MxPwr= 48mA I: If#= 0 Alt= 0 #EPs= 2 Cls=10(unk. ) Sub=01 Prot=00 Driver=usbscanner E: Ad=81(I) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS= 64 Ivl=0ms E: Ad=02(O) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS= 64 Ivl=0ms I'm a bit surprised about the interface calss of 0x10. Bye, Henning
