Hi, On Mon, Apr 07, 2003 at 08:07:36PM +0400, Sergey Vlasov wrote: > At least with Mustek BearPaw 2400TA, there is a difference between using > scanner.c or libusb: libusb is slower. Usually this does not matter - > but at some resolutions scanning becomes unusably slow with libusb (lots > of backtracking, even on Athlon XP 2000+), while the same settings with > /dev/usb/scanner0 gives at most 2-3 backtrackings. This is because the > GT68xx chips have a very small buffer - only 16KB.
Enabling the fork code may also help (gt68xx.c, near the top). Bye, Henning
