Thanks for reply on 1. I have no very strong feelings on points 3) to 5) but have to come back on 2).
A few years ago James W. McAllister, a Scottish philosopher at the time working at Leiden University, wrote a book called "Beauty and Revolution in Science". He noted that scientists in choosing between competing theories are also guided by aesthetic criteria. Beauty and elegance are not infallible guides to the perfect algorithm but such considerations have occasionally stopped me from going astray. The renaming activities around backends, name concatenation in the front end together with a proliferation of generated stub files is neither beautiful nor elegant. I hope you will take some time to try and understand why Linux and nearly all modules so heavily use the approach you deprecate. That something works should not be an argument to reject something that may work better. Regards, Enno Fennema
