Hi, Thanks for having a look at that. Could I remove the offending define(s)?
Brian --- Henning Meier-Geinitz <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 05:13:08AM -0700, Brian D. Williams wrote: > > gcc -o .libs/scanimage scanimage.o stiff.o ../lib/liblib.a > ../backend/.libs/libsane.dylib /usr/local/lib/libusb.dylib -lIOKit -lm > -framework CoreFoundation -framework IOKit > > ld: multiple definitions of symbol _getopt > > /usr/lib/libm.dylib(getopt.So) definition of _getopt > > ../lib/liblib.a(getopt.o) definition of _getopt in section (__TEXT,__text) > > ld: multiple definitions of symbol _opterr > > /usr/lib/libm.dylib(getopt.So) definition of _opterr > > ../lib/liblib.a(getopt.o) definition of _opterr in section (__DATA,__data) > > ld: multiple definitions of symbol _optind > > /usr/lib/libm.dylib(getopt.So) definition of _optind > > ../lib/liblib.a(getopt.o) definition of _optind in section (__DATA,__data) > > ld: multiple definitions of symbol _optopt > > /usr/lib/libm.dylib(getopt.So) definition of _optopt > > ../lib/liblib.a(getopt.o) definition of _optopt in section (__DATA,__data) > > Yeah, that's the already known multiple definition error. Some MacOS X > users don't seem to get that error, some see it. No idea why. > And, by the way, I have no idea why libm should define _getopt. > > Bye, > Henning > _______________________________________________ > Sane-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.mostang.com/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel ===== Brian Williams homepage == <http://chromaticgray.com>
