Quite funny, I already got one request this morning from a guy in Australia who ordere= d the 1660 and got the 1670... If it's similar (by means of the chipset) to the 1260, then it should be = no big deal to support this scanner with the plustek backend...
Ciao Gerhard On Mittwoch, 13. August 2003 02:45, Karl Heinz Kremer wrote: > The new EPSON Perfection 1670 is not and will not be supported by the > EPSON backend. > It's design seems to be similar to the Perfection 1260, which is > supported by the Plustek > backend. I have not seen this new scanner, so I don't know if it really > falls into the same > category as the Perfection 1670. > > The /proc/bus/usb/devices output looks similar (at least it has an > interrupt endpoint): > > E: Ad=3D81(I) Atr=3D03(Int.) MxPS=3D 2 Ivl=3D256ms > T: Bus=3D01 Lev=3D01 Prnt=3D01 Port=3D05 Cnt=3D01 Dev#=3D 2 Spd=3D480= MxCh=3D 0 > D: Ver=3D 2.00 Cls=3Dff(vend.) Sub=3Dff Prot=3Dff MxPS=3D64 #Cfgs=3D = 1 > P: Vendor=3D04b8 ProdID=3D011f Rev=3D 1.07 > S: Manufacturer=3DEPSON > S: Product=3DEPSON Scanner > C:* #Ifs=3D 1 Cfg#=3D 1 Atr=3Dc0 MxPwr=3D100mA > I: If#=3D 0 Alt=3D 0 #EPs=3D 3 Cls=3Dff(vend.) Sub=3Dff Prot=3Dff Driv= er=3Dusbscanner > E: Ad=3D81(I) Atr=3D02(Bulk) MxPS=3D 512 Ivl=3D0ms > E: Ad=3D02(O) Atr=3D02(Bulk) MxPS=3D 512 Ivl=3D0ms > E: Ad=3D83(I) Atr=3D03(Int.) MxPS=3D 8 Ivl=3D4096ms > > I already know of one unlucky customer who thought because the model > number > was similar than the 1660, it would work the same way. > > Karl Heinz > > _______________________________________________ > Sane-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.mostang.com/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel
