Paul, > Just for the record, the second portion of the patch that I sent does > check to see whether the SG driver did not accept the larger buffer size, > and does at least emit a warning and reset the buffer size. The patch
Ouch, yes, you are right. Sorry that I missed that. Again a proof that I should read mails a bit more carefully before responding ;) > just moves that test from the configuration file parsing section, where it > was useless, to after the backend tries to set the SG buffer to the > requested size. Anyway, I agree that it is better for the backend to stop > and emit an error message. Abel
