Hi, it is a compile time option and as I stated earlier, it's fail safe that kind, that if I stop the resource-manager, the scanner is still accessible, even if the open call (to the res mgr) fails, the "standard" open will be called...
I'll wait for a couple of days now, then I'll check it in, so everybody is able to check this... Ciao, Gerhard On Monday 19 July 2004 00:35, m. allan noah wrote: > as long as it is a compile-time option not to include it (since my > machines wont have it, and i dont want sane to bother looking), it seems > ok. > > allan > > On Sun, 18 Jul 2004, Gerhard Jaeger wrote: > > Hi, > > > > the change should be failsafe, as it still tries to open the > > device we'd like to open if the resmgr_open fails. > > I did some tests on my SuSE box - w/o problems so far. I'll do > > some more, but I expect no further probs... > > > > Ciao, > > Gerhard > > > > On Friday 16 July 2004 21:11, Oliver Rauch wrote: > > > Is the change failsave? Do you - or anyone else - have any experience > > > with the resource manager? > > > > > > Oliver > > > > > > Am Fre, 2004-07-16 um 12.44 schrieb Gerhard Jaeger: > > > > Hi list, > > > > > > > > I found that SuSE patches the SANE sources that way, that the package > > > > will use the resource manager library to open SCSI AND USB devices. > > > > I'd like to include this patch (see below), are the any objections? > > > > For more information about the resource manager, see: > > > > http://www.lst.de/~okir/resmgr > > > > > > > > Ciao, > > > > Gerhard > > -- > "so don't tell us it can't be done, putting down what you don't know. > money isn't our god, integrity will free our souls" - Max Cavalera
