Henning Meier-Geinitz <[email protected]> wrote: Hi,
> Now again in the main part of saned: > > sane_cancel (handle[h].handle); > > That's called with h = -1. Either that causes a segfault or the call > to sane_cancle of the gt68xx backend with some random handle causes > the segfault. It segfaults right away when the pointer is dereferenced, probably early in sane_cancel(). > I guess saned should check for -1 here before calling sane_cancel. Definitely. Thanks for tracking it down, I was going to do just that later in the afternoon. JB. -- Julien BLACHE <http://www.jblache.org> <[email protected]> GPG KeyID 0xF5D65169
